Peter Geoghegan

Journalist, author, broadcaster

Warm welcome in Derry as 'truth is set free' after 38 years

At 9:45am yesterday, 56 men and women met in silence at Derry’s historic city walls.

In the course of a solemn, purposeful procession, they walked by the Bogside’s low-rise flats complexes and on past William Street, each carrying a black-and-white picture accompanied by four short words, “Set the truth free”.

Less than an hour later, their 38-year-old call was answered. Inside the ornate Guildhall, the group, all relatives of the 27 people killed and injured in Derry on 30 January, 1972, read the first public copies of Lord Saville’s report into the events of Bloody Sunday. Despite stretching to more than 5,000 pages, this report, the result of the longest-running and costliest inquiry in British legal history, leaves no room for equivocation: the British Army in Derry fired on unarmed civilians without justification or provocation.

Acknowledging Saville’s report in the Commons, David Cameron’s speech – the most statesmanlike of his brief tenure – was peppered with words such as “sorry”, “wrong” and “unjustifiable”; sentiments conspicuous by their absence from Lord Widgery’s original, rushed, whitewashed report, published weeks after the event.

Back in Derry, thousands gathered outside the Guildhall, the city’s main civic building, to watch Mr Cameron’s speech live on big screens specially erected for the event. Ringed by larger-than-life photographs of the 13 people shot dead by British paratroopers – and pictures of another man, John Johnson, who died of injuries sustained that day – the people of Northern Ireland’s second city came expecting answers.

Applause rippled across the crowd as the Prime Minister summarised the report’s main findings: soldiers from 1 Para fired the first shots; none of the dead was armed; soldiers gave no warning. But claps audibly turned to boos as Mr Cameron praised the army’s role in Northern Ireland during Operation Banner: the North’s history is still a fractured and divided one.

The publication of the Saville report has been welcomed by republicans, but caused consternation among loyalists: if the deaths of 14 Catholics justify a £191 million inquiry, many ask, why do the 11 Protestants killed by the Provisionals at Enniskillen on Remembrance Sunday, 1989, or the nine dead at Claudy not deserve similar treatment?

But Bloody Sunday is different. The killers were not loyalist or republican paramilitaries, but members of the British security forces. It was the state, as Saville makes clear, that carried out these killings, the largest such incident since the Peterloo massacre in Manchester of 150 years earlier.

Saville’s findings are unlikely to disrupt the power-sharing government at Stormont – not least as they cleared deputy first minister Martin McGuinness, an IRA commander in Derry and one of the 922 people who gave oral testimony to the inquiry, of any wrongdoing on Bloody Sunday. But whether or not the Director of Public Prosecutions decides to press charges against any of the soldiers involved could have important implications, particularly for the North’s newly devolved policing and justice department.

“Widgery’s lies have been exposed. The truth has been brought home at last,” Tony Doherty, whose father, Paddy, was shot dead aged 31 on Bloody Sunday, told the crowd at the Guildhall.

Saville has set the truth free – now the attention, in Northern Ireland and beyond, will turn to what the authorities decide to do with his answers.

This piece first appeared in The Scotsman on June 15

Warm welcome in Derry as 'truth is set free' after 38 years

One thought on “Warm welcome in Derry as 'truth is set free' after 38 years

  1. Good piece Peter, thanks. I've been thinking about the discrepency in terms of attention and public spending between the Bloody Sunday Inquiry and the likes of Enniskillen, Omagh and the Brighton bombing and although I sympathise with all victims of paramilitaries and their families, I do think it is significant, as you mention, that it was the state which perpretated the Bloody Sunday killings.

    But I also think that it's worth remembering that it's only now that the Bloody Sunday victims have been properly regarded as innocent victims. So whereas victims of other atrocities have always been considered just that – victims – the families of the Bloody Sunday victims are only at that stage now, 38 years later, very much square one to a large extent, and with noone having been prosecuted for killing their loved ones.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to top